Generative Mechanics of Metavalent Stigmergy?

Are these the clunky, crude, and basically dumb Pavlovian mechanics of generative Metavalent Stigmergy? Are these tools and techniques for engineering the very seeds of perceived realities?

If we are finally learning about such tools and techniques publicly, today, how long have they actually been deployed and in common use in military and other contexts?

Ethical Non-negotiables, FTP: Recognize and honor intrinsic inalienable individual agency and maximize depth and breadth of fully informed consent.

On the Upside

In terms of the potential for positive, self-directed, individual transformation, turns out the local narrator – from the quintessential infernal inner critic, incessant self-incriminating ambivalent asshole; the hard-driving drill sergeant, or uplifting internal coach and encourager – these are only a few of infinite possible internal narrators of our moment to moment experience.

“We have to change the valence of that statement (which defines our historic understanding of immutable default consensus reality).” — Moran Cerf

Of course we do. How could it be any other way?

Watch “How to Bend Reality to Your Will and Become Unstoppable – Moran Cerf on Impact Theory” if the embed below does not behave nicely.

Have you discovered or learned something interesting or valuable here? Something that piqued your imagination, creative, research, discovery or other academic, philosophical, or spiritual interest? Let us know with ETH 0x1eb2d6E3f26fBBF31B485bbe3e316D6dAd806632, Cashtag $metavalent, or Patreon. Every action we take in this multiverse, however small, matters and makes a difference. So, thank you and blessings, in this very moment!

Hey, Meta Micro-Macro Pattern Recognizers!

To what extent is this essentially the same teaching, if at all?

Watch “Pure Perception: Ziji Rinpoche” if the embed below does not behave nicely.

Or this?

Watch “Revelation & Awakening: Conscious Intentionality and Manifestation” if the embed below does not behave nicely.

The scientific evidentiary burden of proof to call “woo” is now on you, dearest objecting objectivist friend. All you have to do is bring out the Observer and their Effect, describe The Observer’s nature and characteristics by reproducible means, and easily reclaim the metavalence of a bygone 20th century weltanschaaung, right?

Or have we entirely lost the capacity to listen, in any meaningful way, to anything we’ve not already pre-authenticated and pre-decided?

Watch What does it mean to listen? – Krishnamurti if the embed below does not behave nicely.

Be Love! <3 <3 <3