'There is too much to say and it goes in all directions.' (Ted Nelson). What else is left to 'DO' in the post-singularity #PostAutomationEra ... other than our imperfect, level best to curate a SupraSensory existenial <stdio> PromptStream for entraining to the SIGNAL of implicate order of tranquility amidst NOISE of Molochian explicate disordered chaos? See C.S. Lewis #StoryItself for detailed non-symbolic math and ethical geometry schematics. Too much unfamiilar vocabulary? Want to dismiss as 'word salad'? We've even GIVEN YOU the AI to look it all up, FOR FREE, genius. But nevermind all that wholly unjustifiable snark, right? You're welcome.

🦋 bsky | 𖢻 ens | 𓃰 mstdn | 🤖 reddit | .𝕏.

Provenance of the term "metavalent" and the concept of "metavalent stigmergy" have specific origins and meanings that can be traced back to the mid-to-late 1990s, as indicated by the information from the archived sources. The USPTO has recognized live trademark rights to the compound term 'metavalent stigmergy,' but USPTO was confused by the volume of co-opted references in the field metallurgy in recent years. The usage of 'metavalent bonding' is linguistically appropriate in metallurgy; however, failing to cite the source of the term 'metavalent' as easily referenced in ICANN WHOIS, is not appropriate, professional, or legal, when ICANN's metavalent.info is clearly first registered in 2006 and first archived 2007; followed by migration to .com, .net, .org in 2007, subsequently archived from 2008, forward. Search for 'metavalent stigmergy' at USPTO Trademark Search for details. Not that the origin of ideas matter, I suppose. Although, I do want my journals back, Lauren.